llm-anthropic 0.29

📰 Don’t be fooled by this summer of AI hype It’s been a busy few months for AI hype. At the end of April, Anthropic claimed that its model Claude Mythos is better at finding software vulnerabilities than most security experts. Then we had th... 📰 Source: MIT Technology Review 🔗 Archive: https://web.archive.org/web/https://www.technologyreview.com/2026/09/22/1144867/dont-be-fooled-summer-ai-hype/ # AI # ArtificialIntelligence

Anthropic launches Claude Opus 5.5 with stricter safeguards for cybersecurity

There’s been a lot of talk about Anthropic nerfing models over time. So I decided to test it. I’ll be running a series of deterministic tests on Opus 5.5 for the next month every day and will log any discrepancies. I’ll be announcing results daily on the repo: ⭐️ https://github.com/ninjahawk/livenerf I will be very transparent in this benchmark and it will all be independently verifiable. You’re free to open PRs with your own additions as well and it’ll be merged after I’ve reviewed it. I used Claude to design the tests but intentionally made them be difficult tasks that will not change throughout the month. Meaning if it’s capable of a task now but isn’t later in the month, that should show since up since the questions won’t be changing. Gonna put the theory to rest. If they do genuinely

Anthropic went CRAZY (Opus 5.5)